Economic Victims of Banks and Government Squatting in Bank Owned Real Estate

A growing trend during the current recession ismortgage may lower the rate temporarily to 4% or
squatters moving into bank-owned homes and living inless to assist homeowners who demonstrate a
them rent and mortgage free. Although this seemslong-term ability to keep their loan current. While this
astonishing, with the inflated real estate bubble not yetmay be a temporary loss to the lender, it will not be a
completely burst, lenders reluctant to recognize lossestotal loss, as is the case with many foreclosures. And
on such properties, and so many abandoned homesthis agreement could be worked out between the
available, it was a likely result of the collapse.owners and bank voluntarily, with foreclosure as the
With real estate developers having built far morelast resort.
houses than could ever have been sold, realBut right now, banks have every incentive not to
homelessness does not have to be an option fordedicate extra resources to helping borrowers. Instead,
foreclosed homeowners or laid-off workers. Instead,they can let homes go into foreclosure and try to keep
they can often just move into an empty property andreal estate prices artificially high. When this plan fails
take further advantage of the bubble in real estateand they are forced to recognize total losses on loans,
building.they simply blackmail or threaten legislators into handing
Rents and selling prices in many areas of the nation willover billions of dollars to paper over losses.
still need to come down to reflect a return to moreThis keeps foreclosure rates high and pushes
reasonable real estate values. But banks, which werehomeowners out of properties, all the while forcing
too willing to lend 100% of the value of an inflatedthem to contribute to the bailing out of the mortgage
property, are now reluctant to acknowledge theirholders. Obviously, the banks feel entitled to looting
mistakes and allow borrowers to sell for less than thetaxpayers for trillions of dollars and Congress and the
total amount owed on the mortgage.Federal Reserve acquiesce to such demands time
Banks' unwillingness to allow short sales is forcingand time again.
selling prices higher than the market value ofThus, who can blame foreclosure victims or the
properties, especially properties in default. In someunemployed for feeling as if they are entitled to share
areas of the country, a large number of homes arein the bank's wealth (i.e., the taxpayers' wealth) and
selling for $300,000 to $1 million, but rentals aretake over bank-owned foreclosed properties? People
available for $600 to $1,200. Landlords must be losingare being forced to bail out financial institutions, so they
large amounts of money every month.force their own way into a piece of the bailouts by
Lenders are also reluctant to help homeowners stay insquatting and living rent free.
their houses by modifying mortgages or offering otherEither the bailouts need to stop for everyone, or
realistic solutions to help avoid foreclosure. This makeseveryone should get a free home. Over $10 trillion has
it almost inevitable that borrowers will have to sell, butbeen appropriated by Congress and the Fed for
then they run into the problem of getting a short salesolving the financial crisis so far, which amounts to
approved by their mortgage company.over $33,000 for every person in America. That could
So real estate prices are still overvalued compared tobe enough to allow people to live mortgage and
the rents that properties are generating, andconscience free inside an empty house for a long time.
foreclosure rates are higher than they wouldSquatting in an abandoned or foreclosed home is
otherwise be if banks willingly worked withclearly wrong (at least morally, since legal
homeowners. In a freer market than we have now,determinations mean nothing anymore), and not an
banks would have an incentive to work withactivity anyone should engage in. But banks squatting in
homeowners to stop foreclosure if there was athe American economy, threatening destruction of the
realistic expectation of having the loan paid back inentire financial system, and living parasitically off of the
time.productive is wrong on an even bigger scale. Putting
For example, banks charging 6% interest on aan end to the latter may put an end to the former.